--> Random Post

film

Notes on “Here Comes Nobody”

14 May, 2012 by

“…But such acts of lulzmaking are magnetic on two levels, producing spectacular, shocking, and humorous events and images that attract media attention while simultaneously binding together the collective and rejuvenating its spirit. This runs counter to the reductive arguments about whether or not online organizing can breed the conditions necessary for serious, effective activism (see Clay Shirky in the affirmative, Malcolm Gladwell in the negative); the pursuit of lulz, and the shared technology used to do so, are means of creating a common, participatory culture. (Of course, the pursuit of lulz is also an end in and of itself.) ”
-from Here Comes Nobody by David Auerbach and Gabriella Coleman

If there is one explicit role of the internet in relation to activism, it is to cultivate a broader accessibility to political and social issues. Without question, Anonymous does this. However, there have been a rash of viral political agendas that have seen light through videos, online petitions, and twitter campaigns. Do these attempts at broadening the accessibility of activist agendas fulfill their greatest function or do they reduce human rights issues and campaigns for social change to  a novel 21st century spectacle?

Since its rise in popularity, there has been no shortage of critiques regarding the Kony 2012 campaign in which young, well-to-do, white American men do their best to disarm and dismantle the militant, child-soldiered regime of warlord Joseph Kony by way of viral video. The video moved swiftly through social media circles, accumulating likes, notes, and retweets at an unheard of rate. Invisible Children, the organization responsible for the video, was able to gin up a tremendous amount of online support for their cause. But outside of a whole host of ethically dubious issues surrounding the content of the video itself – did the Kony 2012 campaign transfer into a meaningful movement that yielded real-world results? The Invisible Children campaign demonstrates one end of a spectrum of political activism on the web.

On a separate end of this spectrum are the protests of SOPA and CISPA, as well as more divisive gestures of direct action like the Anonymous attack on major credit card companies, dubbed Operation Payback. It seems that one factor behind the effectiveness of these campaigns is their relation to the internet. They toe a line between virtual and physical consequences. The swift backlash against SOPA and CISPA existed so prominently on the internet, quite obviously, because it concerned the internet. It concerned the freedom of its users, and the sovereignty of its institutions. The same might be said for Operation Payback. This coordinated effort by Anonymous to attack major credit card providers that denied service to those who sought to donate money to Wikileaks produced such strong feelings within the organization simply because the issue at hand related directly to the agency of a website. Understanding the link between earnestness and effectiveness is not an issue unique to the internet, but as web-culture expands its gaze, it is important to assess the internet’s ability to bring about meaningful change in circumstances far removed from the web.
-
Hand Motions is a blog column on DINCA continually featuring writing from Louis Doulas, Wyatt Niehaus and Ria Roberts.

Share

Support the 2012 Chicago Underground Film Festival Kickstarter Campaign

8 May, 2012 by

There’s only three days left to help the Chicago Underground Film Festival reach it’s Kickstarter goal. Please consider donating to this worthy cause. The CUFF crew does some truly amazing things in Chicago — year-round — and the festival fosters a fecund environment for underground filmmakers, freaks, patrons, and curious movie watchers every year.

The CUFF just released its 2012 official lineup and it looks promising. View the 2012 lineup via Bad Lit.

Support the arts. Help CUFF.

The CHICAGO UNDERGROUND FILM FESTIVAL (CUFF), a showcase of defiant and offbeat cinema that confronts the tired, the market-driven, and the predictable. Through its eight-day program of adventurous, experimental works, CUFF celebrates the artistic, aesthetic, and just plain old fun side of independent filmmaking while challenging and transcending commercial and audience expectations.

Much more than a film festival, CUFF has gained a reputation as one of Chicago’s most anticipated cross-cultural summer events. Daily screenings at the Gene Siskel Film Center are followed by parties and live music events.

Exhibiting filmmakers receive travel stipends and lodging to attend the Festival, plus full accreditation that includes access to all public screenings, parties, concerts, and other events. With support from the Independent Feature Project (IFP)/Chicago, the Festival also provides filmmakers with prime exposure and networking opportunities with engaged programmers and producers. What’s more, CUFF presents hand-crafted trophies to the films that are deemed best or most interesting in a wide variety of categories, along with “Made in Chicago” and Audience Choice Awards.

Your contribution will help CUFF bring out-of-town artists to Chicago for this year’s festival, providing funds for travel and lodging. CUFF aims not simply to screen film and video, but also to provide a forum for discourse between filmmakers and audience members. As external funding sources for the arts continue to disappear, it has become increasingly difficult for festivals to provide travel stipends, or for artists to finance their own plane tickets and hotel rooms. Each artist that CUFF is able to bring to Chicago enriches the festival experience for both the audience and the other filmmakers, and your donation will have a direct effect in sustaining CUFF’s role as a dynamic, challenging, and fun part of Chicago’s cultural calendar and summer film festival circuit.

Check out our pledge levels…we want to thank you for your efforts…but feel free to pledge any amount you wish! No rules! — Bryan Wendorf, CUFF

 

More

2012 CUFF kickstarter page

CUFF website

2012 CUFF Official Lineup via Bad Lit

Share

Photos from the 50th Ann Arbor Film Festival

4 April, 2012 by

People in the Michigan Theater Lobby

Program Director David Dinnell with filmmakers Robert Todd & Jodie Mack

Michigan Theater Marquee

Michael Robinson speaks

Candles

Sunny at the merch booth

35mm Clear Leader

Jesse Malmad (Bad At Sports) & Tom Colley (Video Data Bank) chillin'

American Falls signage

Phil Solomon's American Falls

Phil Solomon's American Falls

Phil Solomon's American Falls

Phil Solomon's American Falls

Leighton Pierce Threshold Of Peripheral Induction signage

Leighton Pierce's Threshold Of Peripheral Induction

Leighton Pierce's Threshold Of Peripheral Induction

Leighton Pierce artist talk at the Threshold Of Peripheral Induction installation

Some photographed moments from the 50th Ann Arbor Film Festival. Feel free to share and use.

There are plenty more photos by Abby Rose here.

More:

Ann Arbor Film Festival

Phil Solomon’s website

Leighton Pierce’s website

Michael Robinson’s website

Jodie Mack’s website

Robert Todd’s website

Video Data Bank

Bad At Sports

(Photos by Theodore Darst)

Share

2012 (50th) Ann Arbor Film Festival Award Winners

2 April, 2012 by

Ann Arbor Film Festival
50th Festival Award Winners

“The 50th Ann Arbor Film Festival is proud to announce this year’s award winning films as chosen by our esteemed jury: Michael Robinson, Kathy Geritz and Peter Rose.”

Ken Burns Award for Best of the Festival
Lack of Evidence (Manque de Preuves) (Hayoun KWON)

The Stan Brakhage Film at Wit’s End Award
Voluptuous Sleep (Betzy Bromberg)

Lawrence Kasdan Award for Best Narrative Film
Palaces of Pity (Daniel Schmidt, Gabriel Abrantes)

Michael Moore Award for Best Documentary Film
Guañape Sur (János Richter)

Award for Best International Film
Untitled (Neil Beloufa)

Peter Wilde Award for Most Technically Innovative Film
Vexed (Telcosystems)

\aut\FILM Award for Best LGBT Film
The Evil Eyes (Bobby Abate)

Award for Best Sound Design
Remote (Jesse McLean)

Kodak/Colorlab Award for Best Cinematography
Undergrowth (Robert Todd)
Within (Robert Todd)

The No Violence Award
If the War Continues (Jonathan Schwartz)

Gus Van Sant Award for Best Experimental Film
Sounding Glass (Sylvia Schedelbauer)

Chris Frayne Award for Best Animated Film
It’s such a beautiful day (Don Hertzfeldt)
Traces (Scott Stark)

The Barbara Aronofsky Latham Award for Emerging
Experimental Video Artist

Ceibas: The Epilogue – The Well of Representation
(Evan Meaney)

Prix DeVarti for Funniest Film
Walt Disney’s “Taxi Driver” (Bryan Boyce)
Shadow Cuts (Martin Arnold)
Pluto Declaration (Travis Wilkerson)

Tom Berman Award for Most Promising Filmmaker
The Strawberry Tree (Simone Rapisarda Casanova)

George Manupelli Founder’s Spirit Award
By Foot-Candle Light (Mary Helena Clark)

Art & Science Award
20Hz (Semiconductor)

The Eileen Maitland Award
Irma (Charles Fairbanks)

Award for Best Music Video
Go Outside by Cults (Isaiah Seret)

JURY AWARDS:

As Above, So Below (Sarah J. Christman)

Tin Pressed (Dani Leventhal)

Curious Light (Charlotte Pryce)

Landfill 16 (Jennifer Reeves)

August Song (Jodie Mack, Emily Kuehn)

A Lax Riddle Unit (Laida Lertxundi)

Quest (Cautare) (Ionuţ Piturescu)

The House (Das Haus) (David Buob)

Envelop by Julianna Barwick (Cam Archer)

Share

Ann Arbor Film Festival Animated .gifs Part 4 (Zoetrope by Jodie Mack and more)

1 April, 2012 by

peddle-powered Zoetrope by Jodie Mack

Another collection of animated .gifs capturing moments in or around the 50th annual Ann Arbor Film Festival.

More:

Jodie Mack’s website

Zoetrope

AAFF 50th Annual AAFF Schedule.

(animated .gifs by Theodore Darst.)

Share

Ann Arbor Film Festival Animated .gifs Part 2 (American Falls by Phil Solomon)

30 March, 2012 by

AMERICAN FALLS
Phil Solomon, US, 2010, 56 min, three channels, color, sound
March 25 – April 2, 2012
Work Gallery  |  306 State Street  |  Ann Arbor, MI 48104 (map)

Here are a few glimpses of the beautiful installation of Phil Solomon’s American Falls at the Work Gallery in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as part of the 50th annual AAFF.

If you’re in the area, surely don’t miss American Falls at the Work Gallery, which runs until Monday, April 2.

Tonight — March 30, 2012 — Phil Solomon will present and discuss a program dedicated to his films at 9:15pm at the Michigan Theater.

More:

Films by Phil Solomon

American Falls at the AAFF

Phil Solomon’s website

50th AAFF Schedule.

(animated .gifs compiled by Theodore Darst.)

Share

DINCA Coverage of the 50th Annual Ann Arbor Film Festival

27 March, 2012 by

DINCA will be in Ann Arbor, Michigan, from 3.28–4.1, reporting on the 2012 Ann Arbor Film Festival.

Today is the first day of the 50th annual Ann Arbor Film Festival. The AAFF has a superlative lineup of events this year, with over 200 independent and experimental works, including new work by Deborah Stratman, Ben Rivers, Ben Russell, Michael Robinson, David Gatten, Laida Lertxundi, Kerry Laitala, Scott Stark, Mary Helena Clark, Fern Silva, Bobby Abate, Jodie Mack, Evan Meaney, and many more, plus some very special treasures and gems from avant-garde cinema.

If you’re in midwest, this is a week of events worth road-trippin’ to; if you’re not in the midwest, this is a week of events worth road-trippin’ to.

The 50th AAFF will include special programs of work by Peter Rose, Robert Nelson, Barbara Hammer, Michael Robinson, a juror presentation by Kathy Geritz, Phil Solomon, Paul Clipson, a Leighton Pierce gallery walkthrough, and three Bruce Baille retrospectives.

As part of the AAFF’s 50 Screen initiative, Phil Solomon has installed his “American Falls” installation at the Work Gallery; Leighton Pierce has installed his “Threshold of Peripheral Induction” at the University of Michigan’s Slusser Gallery; and the Michigan Theater installations, the Gallery Project exhibition, the Nickels Arcade exhibition feature plenty more treats.

More on the AAFF’s 50 Screen Initiative:

The 50th Ann Arbor Film Festival presents 50 SCREENS, a city-wide series of free film, video and moving image installations. Throughout film festival week local, national and international artists will illuminate more than fifty screens in galleries, theaters, shops, outdoor locations and non-traditional screening spaces in Ann Arbor. The intention of this expansion beyond traditional cinema screenings is to more widely engage the public with film as an art form in celebration of the 50th Ann Arbor Film Festival, taking place March 27 – April 1, 2012.

As aforementioned, DINCA will be in Ann Arbor reporting on the AAFF from Wednesday, March 28 – Sunday, April 1, 2012. Andrew Rosinski and Theodore Darst will be representing DINCA; if you, too, are at the AAFF, let us know.

This week on dinca.org is AAFF week, so stayed tuned for some interesting coverage of the festival — also checkout our twitter profile for some menial updates — dinca.org, dedicated to disseminating Sacred Visions 2 U.

More:

2012 AAFF Schedule

AAFF 50 Screens schedule & overview

AAFF: 50 Screens
Share

Trailer: A SPELL TO WARD OFF THE DARKNESS by Ben Russell & Ben Rivers

25 March, 2012 by

A SPELL TO WARD OFF THE DARKNESS (TRAILER) from Ben Russell & Ben Rivers

Get ready for the cinematic hot fire. Coming in Summer 2012.

From pagan re-enactors to Scandinavian communes, black metal concerts to Arctic hermits, and the forever Golden Hour to the Northern Lights, A SPELL TO WARD OFF THE DARKNESS is an inquiry into the possibilities of a spiritual existence within an increasingly secular world.

Starring musician Robert AA Lowe (LICHENS) and co-directed by Ben Rivers (UK) and Ben Russell (USA), A SPELL is a feature-length film that lies between fiction and non-fiction, a record of experience that proposes belief in transcendence as a viable outcome of living in the now.

This trailer features music by LICHENS and LITURGY and was supported in part by PUMA. Creative Catalyst Award in partnership with BRITDOC Foundation - www.britdoc.org/catalyst

More:

Ben Rivers

Ben Russell

Lichens

Liturgy

Listen to: Lichens – Faeries

Share

Thoughts on Act of Valor

26 February, 2012 by

Call of Duty: The Movie, for better or worse

Yar, thar be silhouetted guys about to jump off ana aeroplane

By Jack Kentala

(Preface, before I forget: If you can’t read between my smushed-together lines, I’ll come out and say I liked Act of Valor. I systematically pushed my expectations to their absolute lowest level so that it’d be impossible not for me to enjoy this film. And while the film itself may have its own ulterior motives, it felt like a nice Fuck You to see it on Oscar night, which is the official policy of this critic/filmmaker/alto-saxophonist to not watch.)

In the Call of Duty videogame series, players usually inhabit the roles of faceless soldiers on the front lines of rather intense battles. You play it in first person; when you aim your gun, you literally pull it up to your virtual, invisible face and look down iron sights or a scope. In short: It wants you to feel what it’s like in a hot combat zone. The first time I played it, I could only play a mission or two at a time, since my veins had yet to learn to pump ice water when playing any COD.

Within this framework, there’s usually a very small handful of characters who are integral to the plot and, for the sake of the player’s sanity, they are made bulletproof. If they get shot, they fall down and are combat ineffective for a few seconds, and then they get right back up.

Meanwhile, in the maelstrom of combat, you’re often supported by an endless wave of allies. These poor souls usually don’t last long and, when your crosshairs float over them, you see their phonebook-plucked name, lowly rank, and a stock polygonal model out of probably about twenty varieties. These serve in stark contrast to characters seen in games like the megaselling Call of Modern: Modern Warfare series, featuring guys who have names and appearances that stick: there’s the SAS badass Captain Price, who always goes into combat with only his trademark soft-cover boonie and never a helmet; his mohawked protege “Soap” MacTavish who can’t seem to wash the tactical facepaint off his mug; or the fan-favorite-but-killed-off-anyway “Ghost,” sporting a facemask of a skeleton.

When playing these games on the hardest difficulties – the proper-noun Hardened and the controller-throwing frustration of Veteran – you spend a lot of time flat on the ground, either waiting for your health to magically regenerate or to pick your way across a map in rightful fear of a life-ending headshot if you even, god forbid, rise to a kneel.

I’ve beaten all Modern Warfare games on Veteran – and I say that as a sort of full disclosure rather than trying to impress the zero Dinca readers who give a shit because, honestly, it’s more part of my obsessive nature than flashing those pointless Achievements on my gamercard – and I’ve seen a lot of guys die. But not Price. Not Soap. Sure, I’ve accidentally shot them one too many times in a dark corridor and had to reset to the last checkpoint. (The only consequence besides the reset is a blurred-out screen with “Friendly fire will not be tolerated!”) But those other guys with template last name plucked off a spreadsheet? Those guys get slaughtered. And, no matter the circumstances, they keep magically surfacing from the rear, seem to lack the visual acumen to survey the piles of their fallen comrades, and end up as fresh corpses themselves. You could literally camp out in a corner, just out of harm’s way, and watch these dudes get popped in the grape all goddamn guy.

So therein lies the greatest problem with the feature-length Navy recruitment film, Act of Valor: There’s no Price. There’s no Soap. There’s simply a bunch of guys without personalities rushing into the heat of battles. These are the apparently-”active” “duty” Navy SEALs who are supposed to guide us through Act of Valor. There’s absolutely nothing personable or sympathetic about them. Yeah, one is an expectant father (though it became impossible to tell the difference between him and his similar-looking best buddyroo). Another is black and has a gold tooth. Some are older. Some are younger. But it’s the same middling rush of anonymous white guys like Call of Duty cannon fodder.

But wait–! Unlike the COD masses rushing onward toward a quick, painless death, the SEALs in Act of Valor are relatively bulletproof. As a Navy recruitment film (and I’m not making this up; if nothing else, check out this Huffington Post article [which, to remain neutral in these thoughts, I haven't read in full]), there’s a very clear message: if this movie, somehow, makes you want to become a SEAL, the Navy sneakily assures you that you won’t get hurt. Well, that, or you’ll die a motherfuckingly-heroic death. Other than that, one guy loses an eye but doesn’t seem to mind. Another is shot about twenty times but merely ends up in wheelchair.

So it’s all pretty easy according to the Navy’s version of modern warfare in Act of Valor: No, you won’t get both your hands blown off by an IED. You won’t go mad from PTSD. You’ll only face up against Bad Guys, and you won’t have to make any tough moral choices or follow questionable orders. Shit, you’ll even get to check out exotic locales like Costa Rica, Somalia, and an island off Baja California.

That in mind, there’s not a single mention of the endless War on Terror. Unless I am horrifically mistaken, “Iraq” or “Afghanistan” or any of those bothersome Arab states (or Iran or Pakistan) are never mentioned. This is particularly confusing when, at the start, a graphic pops up when each forgettable SEAL is introduced; it lists the number of tours aforementioned SEAL has completed, though it never say where such tour occurred.

It’s a troubling whitewashing of the United States’ current woes overseas (which, coincidentally, the Modern Warfare videogames also avoid like a shitstick; the developers prefer the safe choice to make The Russians the permanent bad guys). The main antagonist of Act of Valor is an Islamic extremist, but he’s a white Chechen who converted to Islam. Worse: His recruited suicide bombers are also converts, and they’re, for whatever reason, Filipinos. It’s unwieldy plotting because if the movie is going for the gold-standard “Realism” (which is impossible to determine lest you were/are actually a SEAL), it has to take into account that, other than run-of-the-mill encounters with Somali pirates and something as daring as the bin Laden takedown (to be made into probably over a hundred movies over the century; at least Kathryn Bigelow’s will certainly be good), the US military is spending an awful lot of time fighting a bunch of dudes who misinterpreted the Koran and are easily manipulated.

While I’m on the topic of political correctness, I also have to raise the flag on a sequence in Mexico conducted with what I assume are sort of Mexican Special Forces. It involves smuggling people into the States, and instead of going “the easy route” through Canada, it seems the sequence was wedged in there to remind everyone that, technically, Mexico are our allies. (But so is Pakistan, and look how well that’s going.)

There’s also an interrogation scene that, for the sake of brevity and the plot’s timeline, lasts about two minutes. I’m sure the start of the interrogation uses tactics common to skilled interrogators – namely, talking about bullshit just to get the interrogatee talking and to confuse their mental defenses – but it’s absolutely ridiculous. The guy gives up intel with only the implied idea that he’s cutting a deal in which he’ll be able to go back to his family; “Senior,” the guy ostensibly in charge of SEAL Team Seven, only offers the alternate that the Bad Guy would otherwise spend the rest of his life in a “box.” The only aggression shown by Senior is when he cuts the bullshit and, when cued for something dramatic, just kind of sweeps a glass off the table and talks a shade more menacing. No secret CIA prison. No Enhanced Interrogation Techniques; no waterboarding. The Navy, as portrayed in Act of Valor, doesn’t do that! Of course not! It’s like an alternate fantasy world where Guantanamo Bay simply doesn’t exist; where one of Our Own, Bradley Manning (I’ll straight-up say it: that kid is a fucking hero), is under lockdown and solitary confinement, staring down life in prison for what many consider to be one of the most patriotic acts in recent history (e.g. revealing a bunch of docs most of us already knew about or were declassified).

I’ll round out the political correctness: I know Today’s Military is supposedly changing (what with letting The Gays in and all), but the movie takes great pains to show women in leadership roles. In some rare spots it doesn’t clash. But considering that SEALs are one of the last bastion’s of all-male dick-measuring (and all such Alpha Male-ism was scrubbed from Act of Valor), I don’t buy some of the scenes where the SEALs are partly briefed by a woman. That is, without them cracking wise either on the spot or later.

But as for actual Movie Stuff, I’ll offer this minority opinion: the “active” “duty” SEALs aren’t nearly as horrid actors are you’d expect. Sure, the between-mission joshing is too scripted and forced for non-pros, but in the heat of ops, it seems right. Military operations are about killing off your emotional side and becoming a machine of pure logic; communication is used to relay concise action, not emotion. So if it seems stiff when a should-be-stressed-out sniper during one mission isn’t stressed out, well, I can only think of all the books I’ve read and all the secondhand accounts I’ve heard about the need to get completely iced out before and during combat. (And it’s This Writer’s opinion that, unfortunately, that is what probably causes such massive outbreaks of PTSD during wartime. But if that wasn’t the case, we wouldn’t have as effective and terrifying of a military as we do today.) So it’s a no-win situation: If there was heightened emotion in the action scenes, it wouldn’t be “authentic,” and with the “authentic,” clipped way the SEALs go about their business, the average Michael Bay fan might feel a tad cold. (Update: Box office receipts differ.)

The jarring bad-acting moments come out of contrast. The first is a long voiceover that starts the film and carries most of the way through that doesn’t make any sense until about halfway, and it’s read with all the woodenness of a Speak ‘n Spell; it doesn’t help that it’s mostly a bulleted list about such now-vague words as Honor and Courage. The biggest disconnect comes during a scene between the two main Bad Guys, who are professional actors. It’s a quick scene that won’t win any screenwriting awards, but it’s like Orson Welles suddenly showed up for a scene and, by comparison, remind why they’re pro actors. (Kind of how Welles hijacked the part in The Third Man when he gives his famous “cuckoo clock speech.” No offense to the acting capabilities of Joseph Cotton.)

I’ll also offer another choice nugget: Considering that the two directors of this film cut their teeth as stuntmen, this is a pretty good debut. Maybe they had an awesome AD. Or, since it shines best in the action scenes, credit the ASC-approved cinematographer or the squadron of editors. The latter probably did the best they could out of the jumble (and also with the Navy breathing down their neck since they had final cut approval; they apparently were very specific about taking out certain shots and even frames that they didn’t find too flattering or maybe revealed some awesome super-rifle we’re not supposed to know exists), what with a POV that jumps all over the fuckin’ place. There are aerial shots from drones, shots only possible using nightvision cameras, and a lot of Call of Duty-borrowed helmet-mounted cameras that are always slightly off axis and, in general, more annoying than visceral.

Act of Valor, as a whole, seems made by guys who play as much Call of Duty as I do; and Call of Duty itself, in its single-player campaign, aspires to find the same drama as a blockbuster action film with all the realism of its Modern Warfare suffix. And, like COD, the music usually dies out when action happens, since a soundtrack of gunshots gives that hard bass hit to the midsection far better than any sad strings. But the sad strings are there when there’s the need to add some cheese or try to force reflection after the adrenaline-wash aftermath of combat, a quick rampdown of excitement from 1,000 to 10. One second, bullets zip past your ears. The next, you’re on a bird or a boat out of a hot zone. In Act of Valor, this first happens after the film’s first mission, with the SEALs taking swifts out of an enemy encampment, suddenly on a peaceful river in Costa Rica and not hauling ass down dirt roads, chased by successive waves of militamen. Considering the nature of the mission – a hostage rescue that, spoiler be spoiled, was arguably successful – the SEALs probably were trying to push out any bullshit heroics to stay combat effective lest they need to go back to their guns.

It works. (And not just because it’s a bunch of pretty shots of cool tech and ghillie’d up men that cement the status of SEALs as Real American Heroes.) It reminds me of a late-game sequence in the latest COD game, Modern Warfare 3, in which you’re pulling a VIP out a Siberian diamond mine. The game throws you into a familiar Saving Private Ryan-cribbing shell shock, and while you’re being dragged away in what is basically a non-interactive cutscene, you get a gun to ineffectively target the enormous quantities of Russians converging on your position, your aim all wobbly because you’re seriously injured. The series’ trademark Courageous-Yet-Wistful Music kicks in as you’re dragged to a helo, all while watching heroic Delta operators stay behind and cover you in glorious semi-slow-motion. You have no choice to stay, and you can’t help them (e.g. you can shoot as many guys as you want, but the result will be identical) as they stand their ground, get shot to shit, and hold onto every last ounce of strength as they lay down enough fire for the bird to clear the mine before it collapses.

It’s motherfucking heroic – especially if you suffered through that shit on Veteran – as the Delta guys refuse the evac and cover the helo as it leaves, to the protest of Captain Price, who begrudgingly admires the Yanks. Realistic? Rescuing the Russian President and his daughter inside a Siberian diamond mine while brave Delta operators ensure it can get out safely? Not at all.

And the plot and heroics of Act of Valor? Not really.

But both are damn fun.

Share

ScanOps (2011) & Workers Leaving the Googleplex (2011) by Andrew Norman Wilson

24 February, 2012 by

An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations – 365

The Inland Printer - 164

Wohlgemeynte Gedanken über den Dannemar – 281

Wohlgemeynte Gedanken über den Dannemar – 113

Wealth of Nations – 4

The Inland Printer – 152

The Economic Review – 592

Libraries – 109

ScanOps
by Andrew Norman Wilson
2011

Some of Andrew Norman Wilson’s work, especially his work pertaining to google, explores the modern day digital proletariat class, and Google’s surreptitious marginalization of their lower-tier employees. Workers Leaving the Googleplex (2011) and ScanOps (2011) are two components of Wilson’s effort to examine Google’s colored badge worker system.

Workers Leaving the Googleplex (2011) is an essay video that Wilson filmed during his employment at Google, and the corollary of his filming of Workers resulted in his termination from Google. The film is an interesting and earnestly curious look at google’s colored badge worker system, with particular focus on the subordinate yellow badge workers that work in building 3.14159, scanning and digitizing books for Google Books.

ScanOps also plies the territory of internal Google operations. The images are culled from Google Books and are images, “in which software distortions, the scanning site, and the hands of ScanOps employees are visible.”

“ScanOps is (or was) the internal department name for Google’s onsite book scanning contractors.”

So the images (above) are distorted results of the work the yellow badge book scanners have completed during their 4am–2pm shift — a nice visual component to the film — Wilson plans on making analog reproductions of these digital images, perhaps in form of a book or “image/sculptures.”

Apart from his google-related efforts, Andrew Norman Wilson’s work typically carries a warm ingredient of white-collar levity (vide his pond5 remix videos and his FlowSpot Test videos made for pond5).

At his “Quicktime Playback Demo and Networking Session” screening at the Nightingale back in 2011, he would intermittently clunk down the stairs wearing rollerblades, descending from the projection area to grab a sports drink from DJ Office Max — who was spinning Yello’s “Oooooh Yeah” song — and Mr. Wilson quickly slaked his thirst with electrolites, only to sidle his way through the crowded venue and clunk back up the stairs to the projection booth to screen more pond5 remix videos.

Wilson deservedly has a forthcoming solo show at Chicago’s Threewalls gallery, we’ll keep you updated on that.

 

Workers Leaving the Googleplex, Andrew Norman Wilson, 2011, HD video, 11 min, color, sound

Workers Leaving the GooglePlex investigates a top secret, marginalized class of workers at Google’s international corporate headquarters in Silicon Valley. As I documented the mysterious yellow badged “ScanOps” Google workers, I simultaneously chronicled the complex events surrounding my own dismissal from the company. The reference to the Lumiere Brother’s 1895 film Workers Leaving the Factory situates the video within the history of motion pictures, suggesting both transformations and continuities in arrangements of labor, capital, media, and information.

More:

Andrew Norman Wilson’s website

Andrew Norman Wilson on Vimeo

FlowSpot by Andrew Norman Wilson

http://books.google.com/

How to Remove Your Google Search History Before Google’s New Privacy Policy Takes Effect

Share

2012 Vimeo Festival + Awards: Last Day To Submit + New Judges Added

20 February, 2012 by

Today — February 20, 2012 — is the last day to submit your work to the 2012 Vimeo Festival + Awards. The submission process is simple, and if you already have your work hosted on Vimeo, and if you have an existing paypal account, this is an easy-breezy process that takes minutes.

Entrants can submit any original work as long as it premiered online between July 31, 2010 and February 20, 2012, or any original work that has never premiered anywhere.  The winner of each category receives a grant of $5,000 and the Grand Prize winner receives a $25,000 grant to produce new work.

Click here to submit. You have until 11:59pm on 2.20.2012.

It was recently announced that Peter Greenaway (A Zed & Two Noughts, 1985) will be a judge of the experimental category, and Steve James (Hoop Dreams, 1994, The Interrupters, 2011) will judge the documentary category.

The panel consists of three judges per category across 13 categories, and includes actor and director James Franco; Parks and Recreation Star Aziz Ansari, 2012 Oscar Nominee Lucy Walker; Radiohead’s Colin Greenwood; Scott Pilgrim vs. the World director Edgar Wright; snowboard superstar Travis Rice; Thierry Mugler and UNIQLO creative director Nicola Formichetti; Shelly Page of DreamWorks Animation; Barbara London of The Museum of Modern Art; advertising legend David Droga; and many more.

The current list of judges includes:

Action Sports

Advertising

Animation

Captured

Documentary

Experimental

Fashion

Lyrical

Motion Graphics

Music Video

Narrative

Original Series

Remix

 

More:

7 Question Interview with Jeremy Boxer, Vimeo Festival

2012 Vimeo Festival + Awards

Share